GOSPEL WIKI

Gospel Wiki› Book of Mormon› Jerusalem

Jerusalem

The city and land from which Lehi’s family departs at the opening of 1 Nephi. Its coming destruction — seen by Lehi in vision, declared by him to its inhabitants, and later confirmed by Nephi — is the immediate occasion of the entire journey. In 2 Nephi the prophesied destruction becomes reported fact: Lehi confirms it by vision, Jacob reports the slain and the captives, and Nephi rehearses the captives’ promised return and the city’s further cycle of destruction and restoration.

In 1 Nephi

The city as point of origin and home (ch. 1–2)

The narrative opens with a temporal anchor and a biographical note: “it came to pass in the commencement of the first year of the reign of Zedekiah, king of Judah, (my father, Lehi, having dwelt at Jerusalem in all his days)” (1 Nephi 1:4). Both the date and the statement about Lehi’s long residence establish Jerusalem as the family’s home, not merely a waypoint.

In the same year, the text notes “there came many prophets, prophesying unto the people that they must repent, or the great city Jerusalem must be destroyed” (1:4). Jerusalem’s fate is therefore announced on the narrative’s first page and attributed to the testimony of multiple prophets, not to Lehi alone.

The vision: wickedness and the doom declared (ch. 1)

When Lehi receives a heavenly book in vision and reads it, the words concern Jerusalem directly: “Wo, wo, unto Jerusalem, for I have seen thine abominations! Yea, and many things did my father read concerning Jerusalem — that it should be destroyed, and the inhabitants thereof; many should perish by the sword, and many should be carried away captive into Babylon” (1 Nephi 1:13).

Having received the vision, Lehi “went forth among the people, and began to prophesy and to declare unto them concerning the things which he had both seen and heard” (1:18). The text describes the response: “the Jews did mock him because of the things which he testified of them; for he truly testified of their wickedness and their abominations” (1:19). The people’s reaction escalates: “when the Jews heard these things they were angry with him; yea, even as with the prophets of old, whom they had cast out, and stoned, and slain; and they also sought his life, that they might take it away” (1:20). This threat against Lehi’s life is the immediate trigger for the commanded departure.

The family departs (ch. 2)

The Lord commands Lehi to leave in a dream: “he should take his family and depart into the wilderness” (1 Nephi 2:2). Lehi obeys without recovering his property: “he left his house, and the land of his inheritance, and his gold, and his silver, and his precious things, and took nothing with him, save it were his family, and provisions, and tents” (2:4).

Laman and Lemuel protest what they have lost. Their complaint ties the departure explicitly to the city: “he was a visionary man, and had led them out of the land of Jerusalem, to leave the land of their inheritance” (2:11). Their disbelief is stated plainly: “Neither did they believe that Jerusalem, that great city, could be destroyed according to the words of the prophets” (2:13).

The sons return: two missions (chs. 3 and 7)

The sons return to Jerusalem twice from their camp in the wilderness.

First return (ch. 3–4): Lehi tells Nephi: “the Lord hath commanded me that thou and thy brethren shall return to Jerusalem” (3:2) to obtain the brass plates from Laban. The chapter uses both “the land of Jerusalem” (3:9–10) and “Jerusalem” as interchangeable designations for the destination. In persuading his brothers after the second failed attempt, Nephi explains the departure’s logic: “he knew that Jerusalem must be destroyed, because of the wickedness of the people. For behold, they have rejected the words of the prophets” (3:17–18).

Second return (ch. 7): The Lord commands that the sons “should again return unto the land of Jerusalem, and bring down Ishmael and his family into the wilderness” (7:2). When some in the returning party rebel and want to go back, Nephi warns them: “ye shall know at some future period that the word of the Lord shall be fulfilled concerning the destruction of Jerusalem; for all things which the Lord hath spoken concerning the destruction of Jerusalem must be fulfilled” (7:13). He continues: “the Spirit of the Lord ceaseth soon to strive with them; for behold, they have rejected the prophets, and Jeremiah have they cast into prison. And they have sought to take away the life of my father, insomuch that they have driven him out of the land” (7:14). Nephi’s warning to those who might return is unambiguous: “if ye will return unto Jerusalem ye shall also perish with them” (7:15).

Nephi’s retrospective: destruction confirmed (ch. 17)

At Bountiful, Nephi delivers a long speech to his brothers, invoking the exodus from Egypt as the interpretive frame for their own journey. He applies it directly to Jerusalem: “I know not but they are at this day about to be destroyed; for I know that the day must surely come that they must be destroyed, save a few only, who shall be led away into captivity” (1 Nephi 17:43). He then draws the parallel to Lehi’s situation: “the Lord commanded my father that he should depart into the wilderness; and the Jews also sought to take away his life; yea, and ye also have sought to take away his life; wherefore, ye are murderers in your hearts and ye are like unto them” (17:44).

The Lord’s own summary of what the family was delivered from appears at 17:14: “After ye have arrived in the promised land, ye shall know that I, the Lord, am God; and that I, the Lord, did deliver you from destruction; yea, that I did bring you out of the land of Jerusalem.”

In 2 Nephi

The destruction confirmed (ch. 1)

Lehi’s final discourse opens by rehearsing “how great things the Lord had done for them in bringing them out of the land of Jerusalem” (2 Nephi 1:1) and “how merciful the Lord had been in warning us that we should flee out of the land of Jerusalem” (1:3). Then comes the confirmation of the warning that opened the whole record: “For, behold, said he, I have seen a vision, in which I know that Jerusalem is destroyed; and had we remained in Jerusalem we should also have perished” (1:4).

The pairing of this verse with the original prophecy of 1 Nephi 1:13 — “should be destroyed” become “is destroyed,” verified by the same means (vision) — is registered as and rendered in full on the Lehi page.

Jacob’s report: slain and carried away captive (ch. 6)

Preaching to the people of Nephi at his brother’s request (2 Nephi 6:4), Jacob states what has become of the city’s people as revealed knowledge, not surmise:

[Textual] — shared phrasing. Jacob’s report repeats the fate Lehi read in the heavenly book at the record’s opening — the same two-part doom (death and Babylonian captivity), with the phrase “carried away captive” common to both:

  • 2 Nephi 6:8: “the Lord has shown me that those who were at Jerusalem, from whence we came, have been slain and carried away captive”
  • 1 Nephi 1:13: “many should perish by the sword, and many should be carried away captive into Babylon” Lehi’s own restatement of the prophecy carries the identical phrase: “that great city Jerusalem, and many be carried away captive into Babylon” (1 Nephi 10:3). What 1 Nephi states as prophecy (“should”), Jacob states as accomplished fact (“have been”).

The return promised (ch. 6)

Jacob does not end with the captivity. The next verse turns on the same word Lehi’s prophecy had used:

[Textual] — shared phrasing. The four-word clause “they should return again,” spoken of the captives of Jerusalem, occurs at exactly these two places in 1–2 Nephi — Lehi’s prophecy and Jacob’s revealed confirmation:

  • 2 Nephi 6:9: “Nevertheless, the Lord has shown unto me that they should return again.”
  • 1 Nephi 10:3: “according to the own due time of the Lord, they should return again, yea, even be brought back out of captivity” (The only other occurrences of “return again” in the two books are mundane travel within the wilderness narrative, 1 Nephi 16:14, 36, and Nephi’s own restatement at 2 Nephi 25:11, treated below.)

Jacob then extends the city’s story beyond the return: the Lord God “should manifest himself unto them in the flesh,” be rejected, and the people be “scattered, and smitten, and hated” before a final gathering (6:9–11) — the longer covenant arc treated at Covenant of Israel.

Nephi’s rehearsal: destroyed, returned, destroyed again (ch. 25)

Introducing his own plain prophecy after the long Isaiah quotation, Nephi states the principle governing Jerusalem’s history: “never hath any of them been destroyed save it were foretold them by the prophets of the Lord” (2 Nephi 25:9). He applies it directly: warning came “immediately after my father left Jerusalem; nevertheless, they hardened their hearts; and according to my prophecy they have been destroyed, save it be those which are carried away captive into Babylon” (25:10). Then the return:

[Textual] — shared phrasing. Nephi’s prophecy of the captives’ restoration runs through the same three-step chain as Lehi’s — return again → possess → the land of their inheritance — a sequence found at exactly these two places:

  • 2 Nephi 25:11: “they shall return again, and possess the land of Jerusalem; wherefore, they shall be restored again to the land of their inheritance”
  • 1 Nephi 10:3: “they should return again, yea, even be brought back out of captivity; and after they should be brought back out of captivity they should possess again the land of their inheritance”

The rehearsal does not stop at the return. After the Messiah “hath risen from the dead, and hath manifested himself unto his people,” Nephi prophesies, “Jerusalem shall be destroyed again” (25:14), and “the Jews shall be scattered among all nations” while “Babylon shall be destroyed” (25:15) — a second destruction-and-scattering cycle, followed by the Lord’s setting “his hand again the second time to restore his people” (25:17). The departure from Jerusalem also serves as the record’s chronological epoch: “the Messiah cometh in six hundred years from the time that my father left Jerusalem” (25:19) — a marker registered as on the Messiah page.

Nephi’s eyewitness credential (ch. 25)

Explaining why Isaiah is plain to him though hard for his people, Nephi grounds his authority in the city itself: “I came out from Jerusalem, and mine eyes hath beheld the things of the Jews” (2 Nephi 25:5), and “I, of myself, have dwelt at Jerusalem, wherefore I know concerning the regions round about” (25:6). The phrase “dwelt at Jerusalem” occurs at exactly one other place in 1–2 Nephi: the record’s opening description of his father, “having dwelt at Jerusalem in all his days” (1 Nephi 1:4) — father and son each introduced to the reader by residence in the city.

Jerusalem in the quoted Isaiah chapters

Within the long Isaiah quotations, “Jerusalem” appears extensively as the prophet’s addressee and subject — e.g., “Awake, awake, put on thy strength, O Zion; put on thy beautiful garments, O Jerusalem, the holy city” (2 Nephi 8:24) and “out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem” (2 Nephi 12:3). These occurrences are quoted prophetic material, treated at Isaiah and Zion, not narrative statements about the family’s city of origin.

A second exodus (Omni)

The small plates’ closing book adds a fact no earlier writer knew: Lehi’s family was not the only company to leave the city. When Mosiah’s people discover the people of Zarahemla, their origin is dated by the same king whose reign opens the whole record:

[Textual] — distinctive shared phrasing. (the record is hosted on Zarahemla; it is cited here, not re-recorded):

  • Omni 1:15: “Behold, it came to pass that Mosiah discovered that the people of Zarahemla came out from Jerusalem at the time that Zedekiah, king of Judah, was carried away captive into Babylon.”
  • 1 Nephi 1:4: “For it came to pass in the commencement of the first year of the reign of Zedekiah, king of Judah…”

The city’s two named departures now bracket the reign: Lehi’s at its commencement, “in the commencement of the first year of the reign of Zedekiah” (1 Nephi 1:4), and the people of Zarahemla’s at its end in captivity (Omni 1:15). The full treatment — including the verbatim tie of Omni’s “carried away captive into Babylon” to the captivity chain of 1 Nephi 1:13 — is on the Zarahemla page.

The text’s language: “Jerusalem” and “the land of Jerusalem”

The text uses both “Jerusalem” and “the land of Jerusalem” (7:2; 3:9–10) without apparent distinction, treating them as equivalent designations for the family’s place of origin. No physical description of the city’s layout, walls, or features is given at any point in 1 Nephi. Jerusalem enters the text only as origin, destination of the two return missions, and the condemned city whose fate the departure is meant to escape.

The dual usage continues in 2 Nephi: “the land of Jerusalem” (2 Nephi 1:1, 3; 25:11) alongside “Jerusalem” (1:4; 6:8). Outside the quoted Isaiah chapters, 2 Nephi likewise offers no physical description of the city.

Key references

People: Lehi · Nephi · Jacob · Laman & Lemuel

Concepts: Covenant of Israel · the Messiah · Isaiah · Zion

Objects: the Brass Plates

Places: Zarahemla (the second exodus from the city) · Places and Geography (for the Valley of Lemuel, the Promised Land, and the full internal travel geography)

Connections on this page: · ·

Navigation: Index · Connections

Sources

The Book of Mormon (1 Nephi – Words of Mormon). All quotes drawn verbatim from the frozen source files in raw/. Citations link directly to their chapter file.