GOSPEL WIKI

Gospel Wiki Book of Mormon the book of Moses

Moses

Standing disclosure — KJV-overlap material. This page reports verbal correspondence with the King James text of Genesis as textual fact, including where the correspondence follows the KJV’s English. What that correspondence implies about the origin of the book of Moses — in any direction — is an external question outside this wiki’s scope (per the wiki’s standing editorial position on Book-of-Mormon ↔ KJV overlap). Both the book of Moses and Genesis are hosted corpus texts and legal reference points; the wiki maps their internal world and states the divergences exactly.

Scope of this page. This page covers the book of Moses — a record given, in the corpus’s own frame, “unto Moses at a time when Moses was caught up into an exceedingly high mountain” (Moses 1:1) — and the prophet Moses as the corpus presents him. The cosmic prologue (Moses 1), the creation and Eden account (Moses 24), the generations from Adam through Cain (Moses 5), and the patriarchs down to Noah (Moses 8) are treated here. Enoch (Moses 6–7) — the city of Zion, the weeping God, the Enoch prophecies — is hosted on Enoch and is only pointed to here, not quoted.

Two portraits of Moses — kept distinct. The corpus holds Moses in two frames that never textually merge. The book of Moses shows the cosmic visionary: the man caught up to a mountain, shown “the workmanship of mine hands” (Moses 1:4) and the whole earth “discerning it by the Spirit of God” (Moses 1:27). The Book of Mormon, by contrast, remembers the historical deliverer and lawgiver — the man of the Red Sea and the “law of Moses.” The one connection the two portraits share (the deliverance commission) is weighed below; otherwise the Book of Mormon never cites this record nor attributes any of its distinctive material — the vision, the Satan confrontation, the revealed creation — to Moses. (The Eden phrasing the two records share is registered below.)

The prophet through whom the corpus receives its opening account of the heavens, the earth, and the fall. Caught up to a high mountain, Moses sees God “face to face” and endures His presence; he learns that “man is nothing”; he faces down Satan’s demand to be worshipped and casts him out in the name of the Only Begotten; and he hears the purpose behind all creation stated in a single sentence — “this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” (Moses 1:39). The book then narrates the six days, the Garden, the serpent and the Fall, Adam and Eve’s rejoicing that their transgression opened the way to seed and joy, the murder of Abel and the first secret oath sworn to Satan, and the line of patriarchs down to Noah and the coming flood.


The book at a glance

The book of Moses opens outside the creation narrative, not inside it. Chapter 1 is a prologue: a first-person theophany in which Moses is prepared to receive everything that follows. Only at Moses 1:40 — “thou shalt write the things which I shall speak” — and again at Moses 2:1 — “write the words which I speak” — does the creation account begin. The structure is therefore a frame: the revelation of the Creator (ch. 1) precedes and authorizes the revelation of the creation (ch. 2 onward).

ChapterContent
Moses 1The mountain theophany; “man is nothing”; the Satan confrontation; “this is my work and my glory”
Moses 2The six days of creation, narrated by God in the first person (“I, God, said…”)
Moses 3The spiritual-before-natural creation; the Garden; the forming of the woman
Moses 4Satan’s pre-mortal rebellion; the serpent; the Fall; the expulsion
Moses 5Adam and Eve after Eden; sacrifice; Cain and Abel; the first secret oath; the line of Cain
Moses 6–7Enoch — see Enoch (not treated here)
Moses 8Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah; the giants; the corruption of the earth; the flood decreed

A recurring textual signature of chapters 2–5 is the first-person divine voice: the Creator says “I, God” thirty times across the creation days of Moses 2, and “I, the Lord God” through the Garden and Fall — the account is delivered as God’s own speech to Moses, not a third-person report.


Moses 1 — the mountain, and the confrontation with Satan

Moses is “caught up into an exceedingly high mountain” and “saw God face to face, and he talked with him, and the glory of God was upon Moses; therefore Moses could endure his presence” (Moses 1:1–2). God addresses him as “my son” and shows him “the workmanship of mine hands; but not all, for my works are without end” (Moses 1:4), telling him “I have a work for thee, Moses, my son” (Moses 1:6). When the divine presence withdraws, Moses is “left unto himself” and falls to the earth, and after many hours draws the lesson that frames the whole book: “Now, for this cause I know that man is nothing, which thing I never had supposed” (Moses 1:10).

Into that emptied state Satan comes: “Moses, son of man, worship me” (Moses 1:12). Moses’s reply turns on the contrast of glory: “where is thy glory, that I should worship thee?” (Moses 1:13); “his Spirit hath not altogether withdrawn from me, or else where is thy glory, for it is darkness unto me?” (Moses 1:15). He commands, “Get thee hence, Satan; deceive me not” (Moses 1:16), and when Satan “ranted upon the earth” claiming “I am the Only Begotten, worship me” (Moses 1:19), Moses — after beginning “to fear exceedingly” and seeing “the bitterness of hell” (Moses 1:20) — calls on God, receives strength, and casts him out: “Depart from me, Satan, for this one God only will I worship” (Moses 1:20). Satan departs “with weeping, and wailing, and gnashing of teeth” (Moses 1:22).

The chapter’s climax is the purpose-statement. Shown “worlds without number” (Moses 1:33) all created “by the Son… mine Only Begotten”, Moses asks why, and receives the answer: “For behold, this is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” (Moses 1:39). The phrase “immortality and eternal life” occurs only here across the Book of Mormon and Pearl of Great Price — the signature line of the book of Moses has no verbatim echo anywhere in the Book of Mormon.

A disambiguation — the two “raise up” sayings. Moses 1:41 has God foretell that when men “take many of them from the book which thou shalt write… I will raise up another like unto thee”. This concerns the restoration of the taken-away words, and should not be conflated with the Book of Mormon’s separate prophet-like-unto-Moses oracle — “A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you… like unto me” (1 Nephi 22:20; 3 Nephi 20:23) — which is a Messianic prophecy applied to “the Holy One of Israel” (1 Nephi 22:21). Different context, different referent; the corpus keeps them apart, and so does this page.


The creation and the Garden (Moses 2–3)

Moses 2 narrates the six days in God’s own voice — “I, God, said: Let there be light; and there was light” (Moses 2:3) — closing each day with the evening-and-the-morning refrain (the ordinal advancing from the first day to the sixth) and the works repeatedly with “I, God, saw that all things which I had made were good” (Moses 2:10, 12, 18; close variants at 2:4, 21, 25, 31). Man is made “in mine own image, in the image of mine Only Begotten created I him; male and female created I them” (Moses 2:27).

Moses 3 adds a doctrine the six-day account alone does not state: that the creation was spiritual before it was natural. “For I, the Lord God, created all things, of which I have spoken, spiritually, before they were naturally upon the face of the earth… for in heaven created I them” (Moses 3:5); even the trees were “spiritual in the day that I created it” (Moses 3:9). The Garden is planted “eastward in Eden” (Moses 3:8), with “the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and also the tree of knowledge of good and evil” (Moses 3:9) and the single prohibition — “of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it, nevertheless, thou mayest choose for thyself, for it is given unto thee” (Moses 3:17). That clause — the forbidden tree named as a matter left to man’s own choice — is the seed the Book of Mormon’s fall-doctrine later develops (see the connections below).


The Fall (Moses 4)

Moses 4 opens before Eden, with the pre-mortal council. “That Satan… came before me, saying—Behold, here am I, send me, I will be thy son, and I will redeem all mankind, that one soul shall not be lost… wherefore give me thine honor” (Moses 4:1); the “Beloved and Chosen from the beginning” answers “Father, thy will be done, and the glory be thine forever” (Moses 4:2); and because Satan “sought to destroy the agency of man,” God “caused that he should be cast down” (Moses 4:3), so that “he became Satan, yea, even the devil, the father of all lies” (Moses 4:4). This is the corpus’s fullest first-person account of the rebellion; the Book of Mormon reaches the same event only obliquely, where Lehi “must needs suppose that an angel of God… had fallen from heaven; wherefore, he became a devil” (2 Nephi 2:17). The epithet “father of all lies” is shared between Moses 4:4, 2 Nephi 2:18, and Ether 8:25 (three occurrences across the Book of Mormon and Pearl of Great Price — a shared epithet, not a distinctive one).

The serpent’s temptation, the eating, and the expulsion then follow, and here the book of Moses and the Book of Mormon share distinctive phrasing at both the serpent’s promise and the barring of the tree of life — the two [Textual] connections registered below.


After Eden: Adam and Eve, and the first secret oath (Moses 5)

Driven out, Adam and Eve begin to till the earth and to worship by sacrifice, and an angel explains the sacrifice as “a similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten of the Father” (Moses 5:7). Their response to the Fall is not lament but rejoicing: Adam blesses God “because of my transgression my eyes are opened, and in this life I shall have joy, and again in the flesh I shall see God” (Moses 5:10), and Eve adds, “Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption” (Moses 5:11). This is the fortunate-fall doctrine the Book of Mormon states in its own terms — weighed below.

The chapter then turns dark. Cain, loving “Satan more than God” (Moses 5:18), enters a covenant with Satan — “Swear unto me by thy throat… that thy father may not know it” (Moses 5:29) — and murders Abel, glorying, “I am Mahan, the master of this great secret, that I may murder and get gain… and he gloried in his wickedness” (Moses 5:31). The narrator draws the line forward: “from the days of Cain, there was a secret combination, and their works were in the dark” (Moses 5:51) — the origin, in the corpus’s own telling, of the murderous secret-oath tradition that the Book of Mormon’s later history (Gadianton, the Jaredite combinations) repeatedly traces back to Cain. That link is weighed below.


The patriarchs to Noah (Moses 8)

Moses 8 carries the line from Methuselah through Lamech to Noah, whom Lamech names “saying: This son shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the Lord hath cursed” (Moses 8:9). Noah and his sons “hearkened unto the Lord… and they were called the sons of God” (Moses 8:13); “there were giants on the earth, and they sought Noah to take away his life” (Moses 8:18); and Noah preaches a fully Christian gospel — “Believe and repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, the Son of God” (Moses 8:24) — before the flood is decreed: “I will destroy man whom I have created, from the face of the earth” (Moses 8:26). No verbatim Book of Mormon connection is grounded in this chapter; this wiki has no separate page for the patriarch Noah.

Enoch (Moses 6–7) — pointer only

Between the line of Cain (ch. 5) and the patriarchs to Noah (ch. 8), the book of Moses places its longest single narrative: the ministry of Enoch, the city of Zion “taken up into heaven,” and the vision of the weeping God. That material — chapters 6 and 7 — is hosted on Enoch and is deliberately not quoted or registered here.


The book of Moses and Genesis

What the frozen text does and does not say. The book of Moses frames its account as a revelation: “I will speak unto thee concerning this earth … and thou shalt write the things which I shall speak” (Moses 1:40), “write the words which I speak” (Moses 2:1). That frame names Moses — the man who receives and writes — but it never names Genesis, and it makes no statement connecting the two renderings. So this page reports only what the two frozen texts show: they narrate the same account — creation, Eden, the Fall, Cain, the line to Noah, the flood decreed — and diverge in the ways catalogued below. Because the text gives no account of the relationship between the two renderings, the origin question is out of scope in both directions, and every record here is asserted_by: wiki.

The book of Moses and Genesis run the same narrative in the same order: the six days (Moses 2Genesis 1), the Garden (Moses 3Genesis 2), the Fall and expulsion (Moses 4Genesis 3), Cain and Abel and the line of Cain (Moses 5Genesis 4), and the patriarchs to Noah and the flood decreed (Moses 8Genesis 56). The correspondence is close enough, and long enough, that the two are best read side by side. Three things are worth watching as they run together: the change of voice, the places Moses adds, and the single-word divergences.

The change of voice

The most visible difference is grammatical person. Genesis narrates in the third person — “God said,” “God created”, “God saw that it was good.” The book of Moses renders the identical material as God’s own first-person speech to Moses — “I, God, said”, “I, God, created”, “I, God, saw that all things which I had made were good.” The tag “I, God” stands thirty times in Moses 2, and “I, the Lord God” runs through Moses 34; across Genesis 13 neither phrase appears at all (verified by search of the frozen text). The clearest single instance is the making of man:

[Textual] — shared phrasing. () The creation of man in the divine image:

  • Moses 2:27: “And I, God, created man in mine own image, in the image of mine Only Begotten created I him; male and female created I them.”
  • Genesis 1:27: “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.”

Beyond the first-person voice, the substantive divergence is that where Genesis reads “in the image of God”, Moses reads “in the image of mine Only Begotten”. Reported as a textual fact; what the divergence means is a separate question the wiki does not settle here.

Where Moses adds, in place

At several points the book of Moses keeps a Genesis clause and sets new material inside it, without breaking the surrounding sentence. Three examples:

And the book of Moses opens whole blocks that Genesis has no counterpart for: the pre-mortal council and Satan’s “give me thine honor” before the serpent (Moses 4:1–4); Satan put “into the heart of the serpent” (Moses 4:5–6); the sacrifice, the gospel preached to Adam, and Adam’s and Eve’s rejoicing over the Fall (Moses 5:4–15); Cain’s oath, “Master Mahan,” and “from the days of Cain, there was a secret combination” (Moses 5:18–31, 5:49–55); and Noah’s named-Christ gospel (Moses 8:19–24). These are the book of Moses’s own contributions; they are described in the sections above and are not connections, because Genesis carries no matching end. (Genesis, in turn, carries what the book of Moses in scope does not: Seth and Enos, Genesis 4:25–26, and the ark’s construction, Genesis 6:14–22 — the book of Moses ends its forward Noah narrative at the flood decree, Moses 8:30; the ark and the floods themselves it carries only prophetically, in Enoch’s vision — “Noah built an ark… the floods came” (Moses 7:43) — reserved to Enoch.)

The verbatim runs and the single-word divergences

Where the two do not diverge, they are often word for word. The serpent’s promise is identical:

[Textual] — verbatim. () Moses 4:11 and Genesis 3:5 read alike, without divergence: “For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” (The same clause stands in the Book of Mormon at 2 Nephi 2:18, there in the singular “as God” — registered separately.)

So is the marriage formula — “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife; and they shall be one flesh” (Moses 3:24Genesis 2:24, differing only in one point of punctuation; ) — and the barring of the tree of life, recast to the first person:

[Textual] — shared phrasing. () The cherubim and the flaming sword:

  • Moses 4:31: “So I drove out the man, and I placed at the east of the Garden of Eden, cherubim and a flaming sword, which turned every way to keep the way of the tree of life.”
  • Genesis 3:24: “So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.”

Moses reads “cherubim” where Genesis reads “Cherubims” — the spelling divergence reported as a fact, as it is for the Book of Mormon’s Eden verses. (The Book of Mormon carries this same scene at Alma 42:2 and Alma 12:21 — registered separately; this is the Moses–Genesis pairing.)

Elsewhere the two track closely and part at a single word — the kind of divergence a reader deserves flagged, reported as fact and not graded:

Both texts readThe divergence
the enmity between the serpent and the woman’s seed (Moses 4:21Genesis 3:15)he shall bruise thy head” (Moses) / “it shall bruise thy head” (Genesis)
the man become “as one of us” barred from the tree (Moses 4:28Genesis 3:22)partake also of the tree of life” (Moses) / “take also” (Genesis)
the naming of Noah (Moses 8:9Genesis 5:29)“This son shall comfort us” (Moses) / “This same shall comfort us” (Genesis)
the Spirit striving with man (Moses 8:17Genesis 6:3)“for he shall know that all flesh shall die” (Moses) / “for that he also is flesh” (Genesis)
the giants of old (Moses 8:18, 8:21Genesis 6:4)“giants on the earth” / “men of great renown” (Moses) — “giants in the earth” / “men of renown” (Genesis)

The Cain narrative (Moses 5Genesis 4) is the same story with the same lines — “Am I my brother’s keeper?” (Moses 5:34Genesis 4:9), the voice of the brother’s blood crying from the ground (Moses 5:35Genesis 4:10), “fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth” (Moses 5:37Genesis 4:12; Moses opens the clause “A,” Genesis “a”), Lamech’s boast to Adah and Zillah (Moses 5:47Genesis 4:23), and the Cain genealogy name for name (Moses 5:42–46Genesis 4:17–22, with two spelling divergences reported as facts: Moses “Mahujael” for Genesis “Mehujael,” Moses “Tubal Cain” for Genesis “Tubal-cain”) — set inside the book of Moses’s own account of Satan’s oath and the first secret combination, which Genesis does not carry.

The bulk of these pairings are registered here; the register hosts eighteen Moses–Genesis records, at the anchor points, not verse by verse. The origin of the correspondence — why the two English texts read alike where they do — is the external question this page, per the standing disclosure, leaves to the reader.


Connections to the Book of Mormon

[Textual] — the serpent’s promise

[Textual] — shared phrasing. The serpent’s promise in Eden stands in near-identical words in both records:

  • Moses 4:11: “…then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.”
  • 2 Nephi 2:18: “…ye shall not die, but ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil.”

The one substantive divergence is number — Moses reads plural “gods,” 2 Nephi singular “God.” The clause runs through a family of corpus verses: as the serpent’s promise at Moses 4:11 and 2 Nephi 2:18, and as the outcome Alma states at Alma 42:3 (“the man had become as God, knowing good and evil”) and Alma 12:31 (“becoming as gods, knowing good from evil” — “from,” not “and”). Reported as a textual fact; the wording variants are shown, not harmonized.

[Textual] — the cherubim and the flaming sword

[Textual] — shared phrasing. The barring of Adam from the tree of life is narrated in matching terms:

  • Moses 4:31: “So I drove out the man, and I placed at the east of the Garden of Eden, cherubim and a flaming sword, which turned every way to keep the way of the tree of life.”
  • Alma 42:2: “…he drew out the man, and he placed at the east end of the garden of Eden, cherubim, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the tree of life—”

The same scene supplies a second, adjacent shared clause: the reason for the barring. Moses reads “…now lest he put forth his hand and partake also of the tree of life, and eat and live forever” (Moses 4:28); Alma, expounding the scripture “which saith that God placed cherubim and a flaming sword on the east of the garden of Eden” (Alma 12:21), reads “…lest he should put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat and live forever” (Alma 42:3). Alma’s discourse is an explicit exposition of this Eden account; the two ends track it clause for clause. (The registered pair is Moses 4:31Alma 42:2; the “put forth his hand” clause is the same scene’s companion phrase, Moses 4:28Alma 42:3 / Alma 42:5.)

⚖️ Interpretation — the fortunate fall

⚖️ Interpretation — weigh this. The book of Moses and Lehi’s blessing appear to teach the same paradox — that without the transgression there would have been no children, no joy, and no knowledge of good and evil — in almost mirror-image terms. Eve, in the book of Moses, says: “Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption” (Moses 5:11); Adam adds “because of my transgression my eyes are opened, and in this life I shall have joy” (Moses 5:10). Lehi, in the Book of Mormon, states it as doctrine: “they would have had no children… having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin” (2 Nephi 2:23), reaching the maxim “Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy” (2 Nephi 2:25). The shared logic — no fall → no seed/children → no joy or moral knowledge — is striking, and the two share the key terms transgression, seed/children, and joy. The connection is offered to weigh, not asserted: the texts share no distinctive phrase, only the doctrine; the Book of Mormon nowhere marks Lehi’s teaching as drawn from this account, and the wording is independent (Eve’s confession vs. Lehi’s argument from “opposition in all things”, 2 Nephi 2:11).

⚖️ Interpretation — secret combinations, “from the days of Cain”

⚖️ Interpretation — weigh this. The book of Moses supplies an origin-narrative for a tradition the Book of Mormon repeatedly appeals to but never fully narrates. In Moses, Cain covenants with Satan and murders Abel to “murder and get gain” (Moses 5:31), and the narrator generalizes: “from the days of Cain, there was a secret combination, and their works were in the dark” (Moses 5:51). The Book of Mormon traces its own secret combinations to that same root: the Gadianton oaths came “by that same being who did entice our first parents” (Helaman 6:26) and “that same being who did plot with Cain, that if he would murder his brother Abel it should not be known unto the world” (Helaman 6:27); and the Jaredite oaths “had been handed down even from Cain, who was a murderer from the beginning” (Ether 8:15). The distinctive term “secret combination(s)” is widespread in the Book of Mormon (present in some dozen chapters), but only Moses 5:51 roots it explicitly “from the days of Cain”. The reading offered to weigh is that Moses 5 is the origin-account these Book of Mormon passages presuppose; the interpretive step is that presupposition — the Book of Mormon appeals to Cain without quoting this narrative.

⚖️ Interpretation — the deliverance commission (the two portraits of Moses)

⚖️ Interpretation — weigh this. This is the one point where the book of Moses’s Moses and the Book of Mormon’s Moses touch. In the mountain theophany, God commissions him for a future work: “thou shalt deliver my people from bondage, even Israel my chosen” (Moses 1:26). The Book of Mormon remembers that deliverance as accomplished history, in Nephi’s rhetorical question — “do ye suppose that they would have been led out of bondage, if the Lord had not commanded Moses that he should lead them out of bondage?” (1 Nephi 17:24; cf. 1 Nephi 4:2, 17:26). The link is real but rests on the shared figure and event (Moses delivering Israel from bondage), viewed prospectively vs. retrospectively — not on distinctive phrasing (the language of deliverance “from bondage” is common Exodus idiom). It is worth surfacing chiefly for what it reveals: apart from this deliverer-commission, the Book of Mormon’s many references to Moses are to the law of Moses and the Red-Sea deliverer, and none of them touch the book-of-Moses material — the vision, the Satan confrontation, or the revealed creation.


Significance

The book of Moses is, in the corpus, the text that stands before Genesis’s ground: it frames the creation account with a prologue about the Creator and about the smallness of man (“man is nothing,” Moses 1:10), and it names creation’s purpose in one line (“this is my work and my glory”, Moses 1:39). Its distinctive contributions — the spiritual-before-natural creation (Moses 3:5), the pre-mortal council and Satan’s “give me thine honor” (Moses 4:1), Eve’s rejoicing over the Fall (Moses 5:11), and the Cain-origin of secret combinations (Moses 5:51) — are precisely the points where it either supplies what the Book of Mormon presupposes (the fall-doctrine of 2 Nephi 2; the secret-combination tradition of Helaman 6 and Ether 8) or shares its exact Eden phrasing (the serpent’s promise, the cherubim and flaming sword). The strongest of these are textual and are registered above; the doctrinal parallels are offered as interpretation.

One honest finding frames the rest: the corpus keeps its two Moseses apart. The prophet of the mountain-vision and the deliverer of the law are the same man, but the Book of Mormon never cites the book of Moses or attributes its revealed material to Moses; the shared Eden phrasing registered above appears there without attribution. External, real-world questions — whether these events are recoverable by history or archaeology — are outside this wiki’s scope; the page maps only the text’s internal world.


Key references


Enoch · Messiah · Secret Combinations · Opposition and Agency · Index · Connections


Sources

The book of Moses (Moses 1–5, 8; Moses 6–7 reserved to Enoch) and, for the cross-links, 2 Nephi 2; Alma 12 and 42; Helaman 6; Ether 8; 1 Nephi 4 and 17. Every quote is taken verbatim from the frozen source text and cited to its verse.


Every quote on this page is taken verbatim from the frozen source text (the book of Moses and the cited Book of Mormon chapters), each checked against the frozen source. This page registers twenty-three connection records: eighteen Moses–Genesis [Textual] side-by-side records (the book-of-Moses-and-Genesis section), two [Textual] Book-of-Mormon pairs (the serpent’s promise, Moses 4:11 ↔ 2 Nephi 2:18; the cherubim and flaming sword, Moses 4:31 ↔ Alma 42:2) and three [⚖️ Interpretation] (the fortunate-fall doctrine, Moses 5:11 ↔ 2 Nephi 2:23; secret combinations from Cain, Moses 5:51 ↔ Helaman 6:27; and the deliverance commission, Moses 1:26 ↔ 1 Nephi 17:24). Two disambiguations hold: Moses 1:41’s “raise up another like unto thee” (restoration of the words) is not the Book of Mormon’s prophet-like-unto-Moses Messianic oracle (1 Nephi 22:20); and the book-of-Moses cosmic visionary is the same figure as, but textually disjoint from, the Book of Mormon’s Moses of the law and the Red Sea. Distribution facts stated on the page — “immortality and eternal life” unique to Moses 1:39; “father of all lies” at Moses 4:4 / 2 Nephi 2:18 / Ether 8:25; the as-gods (Moses 4:11) / as-God (2 Nephi 2:18, Alma 42:3) promise with “knowing good and evil”, Alma 12:31 reading “knowing good from evil”; “secret combination(s)” widespread but Cain-rooted only at Moses 5:51 — were each verified by search across the Book of Mormon and Pearl of Great Price texts. Enoch (Moses 6–7) is reserved to its own page. Genesis is hosted on this page as a same-narrative side-by-side (the book-of-Moses-and-Genesis section, per the ratified editorial position’s class d); the other Bible books are not cited here. External historicity is out of scope.